Learning is Change

Question 141 of 365: Why do we still take pictures?

I know the answer to this question is obvious. I know that pictures
are beautiful and artful and they capture perfect moments in time. I
get that. They will always exist regardless of how easy it gets to
take and share video. The still image will still reign supreme in
terms of ease of use, both to take and to view. Movies and other kinds
of media will always require more time to review than pictures. The
best kinds of photographs evoke an emotional response that take an
entire film to manifest. All of this is true.

But, I want to know why we continue to let pictures be only that.

Today, I stood and held my son, kicking and screaming, while my
extended family joined mine for an hour with a professional
photographer near to the spot where my wife and I met. We posed in
four different locations, all the while trying to convince my son to
look at the camera and not cry. I think we may have managed it once.

While the photographer took pictures with a digital camera, I couldn’t
help but think that the whole process was something that could have
happened 50 years ago or more. There was nothing more going on than a
shutter clicking and a moment being frozen in an artist’s lens.

What more could there be?

I thought about that a lot. I tried to come up with what the moment
was missing. And I think it is this: context.

I want those pictures to contain the details about how both of my
brothers are mere months away from their wedding days. I want them to
be injected with how much weight my younger brother and mother have
lost. I want them to tell the story about my grandmother seeing her
great grandchildren (my children) for the first time. And more than
anything, I wanted there to be the impetus of all of this: the time I
walked up to my wife in the dorm cafeteria and told her that her
choice to not eat meat was pretty cool. Those stories are in my head,
but my children won’t know them.

Even if I retell most of them in detail to my kids, they won’t see how
it affected those pictures. They won’t see that the context of those
images can be just as beautiful as the images themselves. They may not
even remember their great grandmother. And for this, I wonder just why
we take pictures the way that we always have.

I have previously written about my interest in tagging everything, but
this is different. I don’t want to tag the pictures with these things.
I want them to be a part of the process. I want to spend the time
telling to stories of each image that we take as important so that we
may remember it as such. Tagging really is about assigning meta-data
to objects, but I want the data to be a part of the object. I want the
context to be the process of taking a picture. I want the camera to
collect the story and the photograph at the same time.

Rather than saying “cheese” (or “Chiefs” as we say in our football
loving household), we should be speaking a meaningful word or idea
that brought us here. The camera should capture those and then delve
into the context of each.

Because each of those photographs will be printed in the same way that
they have always been printed, we should be able to create the print
of the context as well. Let the story be the frame. Let the history be
the outermost edge, making the image appear all the more in focus
because we know who the people are. We know them better, and more
importantly, future generations will know them.

I believe that if we don’t change some of the way that we photograph
our world, the history of “us” will be lost. While I know that we are
doing some of this by tagging faces and places, or by tweeting out a
message with a picture, I think we may be missing just how important
the deeper past should be. Without the frame, we have not moved ahead.
Without the story, we are just sharing the same photographs by a new
method. Anyone have an app for that?

Posted via email from The Throughput

Questions 140 of 365: When do we get to see Slim Goodbody?

this is all a dream
Image by underwhelmer via Flickr

PBS is good for a lot of things. Creating unreal expectations for what the world is like is one of my favorites. From having inquisitive puppet friends to being an incredibly good neighbor, PBS made sure that I never had to make reality my full time occupation. My favorite piece of edutainment, though, was Slim Goodbody. He was a man without parallel, a body suit that showed every organ and muscle.

And he was supposed to come to my elementary school. That is what they told me, at least. They put up posters and made a big deal about an assembly that was forthcoming. And as we filed in, I believed that all of my PBS learning fantasies were going to come true.

That was at least until they laid this wonderful little gem on us: we are our own Slim Goodbodies. They told us that we didn’t need to see the man himself because we were him. And that was good enough for some of the kids in my class, but definitely not for me. I kept asking even after the assembly was over when Slim Goodbody was going to grace us with his presence. The other kids thought I just didn’t get it. And maybe I didn’t.

I wanted him, not some version of him that required us to “believe” in his ideals enough to become him. And that is why I can’t handle the social networking concept that we can all be “liked” and we can all be “friends” and we can all be “fans.” I don’t believe that we should be putting all of our trust in the crowd. There is still value in the magic of PBS. There is still value in the purpose and the personality. And one person showing up can sometimes outweigh the millions that believe that they share something in common than that one person.

We cannot all be Slim Goodbody, online or in real life. And that is a good thing.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Question 139 of 365: What are we throwing out of basement windows?

I threw two brand new Spanish/English dictioonaries out of the basement classroom window. It was Spanish class and I was trying to get into trouble. I had done other things, like pull down the world map every day I came into class for a week, or distracting each of my friends by talking over the teacher. It was so bad that I was put in the back of the classroom and told to read or draw, anything to not work on the last nerves of my teacher.

But, I threw books out of the classroom window. It wasn’t high up and I had no intention of watching them drop. I just wanted them to soak up the snow on the ground outside and I wanted the teacher not to have access to them. I was that vindictive and irregular. After two weeks of being out in the elements, I pulled the books back into the classroom and I put them on display in the back, flaying out the pages that were rippled from the immense amount of moisture that they had consumed. I got thrown out of class for that one. We may have even met in the principal’s office for it too. They may have talked about how I wasn’t reaching my potential and how I still had a chance to pass the class if I turned around my behavior.

I had no intention of doing that, though. I was throwing books out of basement windows. I wanted to fail. I wanted it so bad that the last quarter of the course earned me a 4.7 percent. This is a grade that you have to try for. There are more free points than that in the average middle school exam. I used a protractor to make designs on my quizzes. I read Jurrasic Park. There is something to be said for this kind of relentless wish to sabotage everything. Nothing good, really, but surely something to be said. It was a time that made sense only because I thought I knew just how little Middle School counted in life. I thought in was gaming the system in order to create a shortcut. I’m not sure what to, but the shortcut was at least going to be easier than doing everything that I was told.

So, I threw books out of a basement window. At the moment, I cant really think of anything more futile that that. The problem is that I may still be doing it.

This level of sabotage is really only reserved for those who know what they are doing, and I do. I am trowing the resources at my disposal out of the window just to see what the effect will be. I throw away tons of business cards that I get because I can’t be bothered to send a follow up email. I put off actual work because I convince myself that answering introspective questions is more important. I work on because I know that I will get too many things done, too quickly on my laptop. I sometimes ask questions in emails rather than going and investigating the problems myself.

I think that the key here is that I am tossing all of these things out of a basement window. There is no risk and It is just too easy. In push out my responsibilities into the wide world and then pull them back in only when they are unrecognizable and unusable. I do this so that I can claim victory over the things that other people have asked of me or the things that I have asked of myself.

In some situations I am still aiming for the 4.7 percent because I know that relying on my actual talents will make it seem as though I actually care. Which, of course, I do. In college I had to take Spanish. I made hundreds of flashcards and memorized all of the tenses of verbs. I owned a number of Spanish/English dictionaries and I consulted them from my fifth floor dorm room, never once considering dropping them out the window. I cared what grade I got and it showed. I was no longer interested in trying to be considered individualistic or eccentric. I was okay with achievement. I’m not there with my current work. I feel as though I am still in middle school with being productive all of the time. I know that I should be able to tell the difference, but I believe that there is just something about the glorious nosedive that is still very appealing to me. I take a bow and ask for forgiveness and then try to pick up the pieces of what was once a great opportunity.

I think I may need someone to notice that I am doing these things. After all, isn’t middle school all about getting attention. Maybe that is what this book is all about, too: the quest for attention so that I can fail at the other things I am doing. Perhaps it is the appearance of work, like reading Jurrasic Park, that allows me to pass on by without having to really worry too much what is expected of me.

Or, perhaps I am just trying to annoy the status quo into changing. It is equally likely that all of this attention getting is my way of saying that I crave the changes in my environment that will allow me to grow. Even more like my college Spanish classes, perhaps it is that the stakes need to be raised and the environment shifted just enough to make it worthwhile to try. Am I working toward 4.7% because no one has given me a reason to do otherwise?

In a word, yes.

In two words, yes but…

Yes, but there is no graduation standing in between my life now and my life a year from now. There are no major events that will allow me to make concrete changes. It is, and will ever be, my choice to either make flashcards and prepare for what is to come or sit in the back of the room and send out my resources into the elements.

Posted via email from The Throughput

Edit Google Docs Live on the iPad (and iPhone)!

One of the only things that I am still disappointed about with the iPad is the inability to edit Google Docs natively on Safari or through another program. At the moment, there are a number of workaround (Office 2 HD, Docs to Go, etc) apps that allow you to basically download the latest version of the Google Doc edit it on the iPad and then save it back up to the cloud. While this works great for documents that you have penned yourself, it really takes away one of the biggest reasons to use Google Docs in the first place: Collaboration. So, since I got an iPad a few weeks ago, I have been trying to figure out how to edit Docs within the browser itself. Well, now I can. There is a free iPhone app (they have the iPad upgrade coming according to an e-mail correspondence I had with the developers) called Cloud Browse. This basically creates an anonymous instance of Firefox on a remote computer and then displays that firefox browser on your iPhone or iPad.

This app will allow you to play flash and edit previously uneditable text areas, from Google Docs, to wikis, to Moodle. All of these things are now well within the bounds of things you can do on the iPad.

So, go and download the app here: http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/cloud-browse/id346618309?mt=8

And this is how Google Docs looks in Cloud Browse (again, the iPad-only version is coming soon):

Click the Web button so that you can type in an address or search quickly.

Here, I zoomed in on my document list and then clicked on one.

Here is the way the document looks in portrait mode zoomed all the way out.

Here is how it looks zoomed in. Just touch the keyboard in order to start typing in the google doc. I have tried out the chat and commenting and that all works as well. Good stuff.

Posted via email from The Throughput

Question 138 of 365: When are we trains?

Metra UP-NW outbound train 643
Image by thomas.merton via Flickr

Look at me, I’m a train on a track
I’m a train, I’m a train, I’m a chucka train, yeah
Look at me, got a load on my back
I’m a train, I’m a train, I’m a chucka train, yeah

Look at me, I’m going somewhere
I’m a train, I’m a train, I’m a chucka train, yeah
Look at me, I’m going somewhere
I’m a train, I’m a train, I’m a chucka train, yeah

Been a hard day, yes, it has been a hard day
Yes, it has been a hard day, yes, it has
I’m a train, I’m a chucka train, I’m a chucka train
I’m a train, I’m a chucka train, chucka train, yeah

I sang this song in an acapella group. It was originally done by Albert Hammond, but we sang the King Singers version. It was kind of silly and a little repetitive for my tastes, but the beat and the harmonies were infectious. I find myself still humming it on occasion without any provocation.

I just don’t think I ever understood it before, not really anyway.

There is a single track, a single load, a single day or life and all of it just seems to be heading in this forward direction. We are moving faster than we can even fathom. We are harmonizing with the tones of the rails. We are choosing to have the hard days because we choose to move at all. So long as there is friction between our wheels and the steel beneath us.

And sometimes th simple mantra presented by this song is enough to let me know that we are all trains. It is enough to show me just how discordant everything can be from time to time, and how it always resolves in the last stanza. Not that there wasn’t hardship along the way, but the vocal chords come to rest and there is just the gentle hum of the train.

So I’m a train, I’m a train, I’m a chukka chukka train.

I have set so much up for my family, my business, my carreer and everything else that it hardly seems that there is anything that I can do to change direction. I make the gentle nudge, but that is just shifting focus really, nothing is really changing.

I guess I am trying to not derail us, and I’ve been pretty successful so far. I haven’t caused any major bankruptcies or caused any fatalities, which is pretty nice. I haven’t gotten too lost or been made obsolete by some brand new model. I feel like what I haul is worth hauling, otherwise I wouldn’t do it.

But I sometimes want to stop being a train. Sometimes I would like to be able to be a car or an airplane with fewer limitations on direction and maintinence. Sometimes I want to unload and see what it is like in one of the many stops I have made along the way. But I blow the whistle and I move forward like all of the other trains.

The biggest thing about trains is that there are no shortcuts. You have to run the full route. You have to consume all of the fuel.

So maybe this is all a bit vague, but the refrain in my head is louder than ever. These words are all that makes sense to me right now. I do not mourn this fact, but rather understand that it will be my lot so long as I want the ability to carry all of the things that love and need with me everywhere I go. No other form of transportation can be a freight conveyance, comfortable passenger transport, and long distance transit system. For that, I love being a train.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Question 137 of 365: What is our mass pike?

Photo of the Uptown Theater marquee on the dat...
Image via Wikipedia

I loved the smell of show on my pants. The mix of smoke, sweat and other people’s energy. My pants told the tale of a lot of good nights. I had friends that told me to wear the pants the day after the show for good luck, but I was always a little worried that other people would think I was a bum. You see, I went to a lot of shows when I was in high school, mostly punk and indie bands that most people hand’t heard of. I thought I was being cool by attending the underground music scene.

At one such show for the Get Up Kids, I was getting my pants sufficiently stained and odiferous. I invited a friend of mine to come along and she obliged. We got their early enough to stand next to the stage in the packed club, the kind that really should only fit a hundred, but was stuffed with something more like 2 hundred.

It just so happened that as the music started a strong willed boy pushed his way up to the front and started to crowd my friend. With every song, he would push harder to get into her space. He didn’t want to stand where she was standing, he just wanted to push. About halfway through the show I put my leg up on the three foot stage and made a barricade for my friend, using my leg as a fence.

I tried to talk to the boy, talking some sense into him about just enjoying the show, but he would have none of it. He just wanted to push. He wanted to make sure that no one had a good time but him, and he succeeded for the most part.

That is, until the song Mass Pike came on. It was the song that took me by surprise and made the experience worthwhile. When the first chords started on the keyboard, I didn’t even notice that I had to hold back a sea of drunk muscle.

I don’t know exactly what all of this means, but I think that I am holding back the muscle of something much larger than myself at the moment.

I am at the big show, the one that I have been waiting for a really long time. I am excited about being here with someone I love, and I am gearing up to blown away. Up has waltzed a force that has the capability of making sure that I can’t dance or move the ways that I want to. And all I am looking for is the few moments when all of this pressure and undisclosed animosity can melt away in favor of just hearing the music. I want it to flow over me and take us away from the unending push of life.

I understand that pushes like the are what make pants smell the best. I understand that the struggle and the sweat are enough to release just the right bouquet of aroma. I want to be bullied and leaned against, but I also want there to be moments of relaxed extacy. And there will be I just have to know how to look for them.

This is how I knew at the Get Up Kids show, and I’m pretty sure it is how I will know now: I will close my eyes and hear the notes play, just the intro. When those chords come through, the right combination of things that make the back of my head tingle. And I will have a moment of knowing that it won’t last and wanting it to anyway. I work backward from the feeling and tag the moment with every descriptor I can muster so that I can’t possibly forget. And I feel safe in every moment because I know the words and it is my song, our song, being played just for us. That is when I no longer feel the pressure. That is the moment I am waiting for.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Question 136 of 365: What is a family reunion?

UPC-A barcode
Image via Wikipedia

I have never been a part of a family big enough to require a reunion. We have had many family gatherings over the years, but never a reunion. Father’s side, mother’s side, and weird couplings around weddings. These are the closest that we have come.

This week is something of an experiment. My family of four, my parents, my two brothers and their fiancĂ©es, and my paternal grandmother will be convening at our house. Costco, target, Peets coffee and tea, and a very short trip to Macy’s. So far, so good.

It just makes me wonder what we are supposed to be doing to get the most out of our time together. Should we be going out to the Zoo like we plan or should we be staying in and watching movies. Should we send my children off to school and have some more adult time, of is it sufficient to keep them with us every day so that the whole family will get to hang out with them as much as they would like.

And why do these questions suddenly matter so much to me? Well, I think that questions of family are the basis for most of the questions that I am asking. If the family is the most basic subset of a collaborative team, I should want to see just how far I can take my ideas of working together within an intensely tradition-based group.

So, my first order of business was to create a Google Doc for planning out the whole week. At certain times, each member of. Y family has logged in and put in their preferences for food, entertainment, and sleeping arrangements. My mother and I spent a good afternoon getting the document worked out, carving conversations in the comments and then responding with new pieces of information elsewhere in the document.

My father then set up a dropbox.com folder for all of the PDF files and directions that we needed. This folder syncs with my computer and iPad, so I haven’t been out of touch on any aspect the whole time.

The next order of business is to establish a familiar reunion hash tag so that all of us can tweet no matter where we are in the city and we will all be able to follow along. We will also be posting to flickr and facebook using this tag for easy searching. I can’t wait to see the geotagged Map of our trip.

Asfor the plans, maybe we should be putting the whole thing on plan cast so that people will be able to follow along with our exploits. Or, perhaps we just need to post our itinerary afterwards via FourSquare. I feel as though it may be better to know where we have been for some reason than where we are going.

I think we should probably scrobble the whole weekend’s music lisning on last.fm. I also think it might be a good idea to track our coffee consumption with a live coffee cam set up to stream from the kitchen.

Okay, so perhaps those ideas are a bit much, but I am interested in pushing the idea of a family reunion to the estreme, mostly because I can’t stand the idea of being in a family with matching t-shirts. I want to be a part of the family that tags things via bar code (a la stickybits). I want to be a part of the family that doesn’t ever give up in trying to all be in the same place at the same time, even if that means skyping someone in.

I want to literally put my family on the map, a Google Map.

They say that the key to a family is communication, and in this one small area, I think THEY are right. What I would like to attempt is to communicate as much as we possibly can so that no one is left behind, and no one forgets what they are supposed to do, or even what happened. This week is going to be fantastic, not only because it will be filled with my family, but because my family will be working together to create the types of environments that I always want to be a part of.

Who knows, perhaps we will do such a good job of experiencing, communicating, and archiving our adventures that we will be able to play them back like a short film and allow future reunions to simply continue the story.

More than anything, I hope that this week is something that we will struggle to top in the future because we take enough risks and find the right amount of relaxation and fun. Shouldn’t be too much to ask for.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Question 135 of 365: Why don't we say shut up more often?

Cover of "3 Ninjas"
Cover of 3 Ninjas

I have been reliving my childhood through netflix on-demand. It seems as though all of the movies that I loved when I was a kid are available for me to pull up at any hour of the day and watch with my children (with the notable exception of Newsies). I have been doing this for a couple of months now, and I don’t see it stopping anytime soon. There are just too many cheesy children’s movies from the 80’s and early 90’s.

Today we watched 3 Ninjas. It is a classic, at least in the sense that it touched off quite the firestorm of chanting about a friend of mine who liked to be call “Rocky” and a girl in our class named “Emily”. (If you haven’t seen the movie… suffice it to say that one is said to love the other, over and over again in a way that only children’s movies can do). It is also a movie in which both children and adults liberally use the phrase, “shut up.” It is not one that we encourage with our children so we had to have a few conversation about why the children were being mean and not using good manners. I was surprised at how many times it came up, though, mostly because I almost never hear it during the course of my day.

Watching the movie made me think about why it is that I don’t use it and why I am so adverse to its use in my household.

I think it really stems from the fact that I don’t like to be silenced. It comes from my unwillingness to allow defacto authority into the settings around me. And that is what Shut Up is all about, establishing authority simply by calling on those words.

Yet, these boys were able to say it to one another (and I said it when I was their age) so easily. They said it without the hint that they would actually shut up one of their brothers. They said it because it was the thing to say. The insult du jour. They said it because other insults were off limits. But, we don’t have those PG limitations.

We can fling the kinds of specific insults that only come with age and maturity. We can attack idiologies and products, figureheads and policies. In fact, we have replaced Shut Up with blog posts and tweets that disallow the importance of entire political figures, world events or fanboydom.

I believe that the crumudgeon in any organization uses his or her equivalent of Shut Up in order to keep the status quo. The adult versions of Shut Up are much more detrimental because they shut out possibilities rather than simply causing silence or frustration. In a lot of ways, I wish that we would recognize and call people out on their use of adult Shut Up behaviors the way that I call out my kids on their use of those words.

I would love to have the same conversations with adults about appropriate behavior when they don’t like what someone else is doing. I would love to create a space for us to talk out our reservations for going forward, instead of simply creating spaces and ways to say no.

So, here is what I believe are the biggest Shut Up actions I see from adults that I would like to have serious conversations about:

  • Meeting cancelations for dubious reasons.
  • Stating that documents are forthcoming that haven’t been created yet
  • Creating contrary policies based upon specific requests, disallowing specific things that were previously allowed when someone actually wants to do that thing.
  • Waiting for all of the facts to come in without going and seeking them out in the meantime.
  • Not taking notes, or not sharing the ones you have taken.
  • Saying things like “research says” without actually providing a link to the research.
  • To name a few. So, while I am not recommending that everyone go out and watch 3 ninjas, it did provide me wit the ability to have important conversations with my kids, and a blog post.

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

    Question 134 of 365: What can Diaspora teach us?

    5 Ways to Cultivate an Active Social Network
    Image by Intersection Consulting via Flickr

    Until this week I had only ever heard the word Diaspora to describe Jews who are living away from Israel. It had such a specific meaning that I didn’t really think about just how powerful decentralization could be as an idea that can energize people. I never thought of Diaspora as a way to create change.

    This week, though, I was delighted to start seeing articles on a new open source project called Diaspora (http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/196017994/diaspora-the-personally-controlled-do-it-all-distr). It is the so-called “anti-facebook.” Now, I don’t pretend to be a Facebook Privacy scholar, and I have no illusions that quitting Facebook at the end of the month is going to change anything. However, I do find the idea of an anti-facebook compelling. I find the idea of a grassroot effort to connect people together rather than have them gather around a central hub to be inticing enough to give money to. Which is more than I can say for Facebook at this point.

    Diaspora aims to be the first decentralized social network, kind of a peer to peer connecting service. But, instead of trading files, we will be communicating with all of the other “seeds” (read nodes of a the social network/friends). There will be no one who keeps track of your data except for you, and when you are offline, potentially the access to your private information would go offline too (so long as you didn’t host your Diaspora account elsewhere, just like you can host your wordpress account as well).

    Diaspora, as a project, was looking for funding on Kickstarter.com and because of their unique approach to the Facebook privacy problem, they were able to get more than enough (they were looking for $10,000 and the are looking at more than 10 times that now). This is impressive considering that the project was not a whole lot more than 4 geeks who mulled the idea over while trying to create a robot (a makerbot if you want to get specific).

    The real question I have is what can we learn from the upstart, Diaspora. Here is a list that I think may be helpful for remembering (especially when some new startup idea is the darling of the tech blogosphere next week).

    1. Find an outcry. They found a problem that was so pronounced that you were starting to see official protests and boycotts. They didn’t really come up with a solution for the outcry. rather they came up with an alternative. They took the model that Facebook had and dissected it down to its essentials and then built the rest so that it “didn’t suck.” I feel like we don’t cater to creating an alternative to outcries very often. We really do seem to like solving problems by one upsmanship. While we can’t follow the outcry wherever it goes, figuring out just why people are up in arms is a great way to finding something that resonates with a significant portion of the population.
    2. Anti is easier than pro. This is something that I keep having to tell myself when I am reduced to fanboy status. It is so much easier and more effective for creating change when you can discuss exactly what it is that we are against and have that be a part of the daily conversation. If Diaspora would have framed themselves as “a decentralized social network” and not as “the anti-facebook”, they would still be fighting for the $10,000 they were after. Anti galvanizes support, when pro simply appeals to logic. When we feel as though we have been wronged (as many people do in terms of their facebook privacy), anti is really the only option left.
    3. Set an achievable goal. I am always interested to find people that have set goals for themselves and then outpace them. I am more impressed when these goals are not meager. Diaspora wanted to garner $10,000 of support before they tried to build their software and they did it many times over. This was not a small amount of money to begin with, but because they actually set a value, they had something to work toward. Often, we don’t put a value on our goals. We just see if we can reach them and if we can’t, so what? We will just lower the bar. Diaspora didn’t lower the bar. They found something that they were passionate about and then they set a goal that was impractical to begin with. It is one more reason why I believe that anything is possible with the power of social media (after techcrunch and read/write web picked them up, they received the majority of their funding).
    4. Be a geek, with both words and technology. Diaspora is a good idea. It is something that someone was going to create regardless of if it happened now or a year from now. But, it isn’t immediately something that would be easy for everyone to understand. “Disributed social networking” doesn’t exactly sound like a one-button solution. But, people have latched on to it because it has been put in ways that make sense. The video on their kickstarter page is awesome and the articles on blogs and in traditional media have discussed the project so well (and so deeply) that there really isn’t much more to be explained. They were able to start from scratch and run with it because they were geeky enough to have vision, and then they made their vision into words and visual persuasion. It is my contention that you aren’t really a geek until you can tell the story of your geekdom. And, that is exactly what they have done.

    Those are the lessons that I have gleaned from Diaspora, but I’m sure there are bunches more. What can you find?

    Reblog this post [with Zemanta]