Here is the second installment of the Douglas County School District’s conversations around learning and technology, which is cross-posted here.

So, we focused our time today on discussing how to overcome typical stumbling blocks in teachers using technology to reach learning in the classroom.

You can see the show notes below (or simply click this link to see a better version):

The Clever Sheep: Cell Phones in the Classroom
thecleversheep.blogspot.com/2008/04/cell-phones-in…

Cell Phones in the Classroom

How is your school leveraging cell phone technology for student learning?In the schools my children attend, mobile phones are not welcome. The regional district school board is jamming the genie back into the lamp, even though the use of handheld technology is ubiquitous in the real world. Rather than restrict the use of this technology, educators (and their students) would be better served, if they were actually to be encouraged to use this technology in their classrooms.

One article on the use of cell phones in the classroom. Do our teachers feel empowered to use cell phones in the classroom. Are there management issues with using cell phones in the classroom?

Using cell phones rather than checking the laptop carts out.

HypeCycle.png (PNG Image, 720×540 pixels)
static7.userland.com/oracle/gems/reynolds/HypeCycl…

A diagram of Technology integration?

Looking to spur wiki adoption? Want to grow from 10 users to 100, or 1000? Applying patterns that help coordinate people’s efforts and guide the growth of content, and recognizing anti-patterns that might hinder growth – can give your wiki the greatest chance of success.

Wikipatterns.com is a toolbox of patterns & anti-patterns, and a guide to the stages of wiki adoption. It’s also a wiki, which means you can help build the information based on your experiences! Beyond this site, there are many other additional resources.

NEW Wikipatterns book!
This book provides practical, proven advice for encouraging adoption of your wiki project and growing it into a useful collaboration tool or vibrant online community. learn more

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: RSS

I wrote the draft of this yesterday, so I’m pretty sure it still counts for my writing a blog post every day this year goal.

I realized something quite major for me today. I really hate picking up the phone. In fact, I have become afraid of it. It is threatening to me.

Every time I pick up my cell phone, someone needs me to work on something or to help solve an issue that could easily be worked through by simply googling the topic or with a few e-mail exchanges (or better yet, working through a forum so that the issues that we resolve can be shared out with others).

I guess I have known this for a while, but I am stating it now: Voice is inefficent.

Voice is beautiful and personal, but when all it conveys is information then it is just not worth the breath it takes to produce. We should save our voices for oratory and humor. We should save our voices for storytelling and nuanced debate. But for mere information, let’s use email or txt. Let’s use discussion forums. Let’s blog and edit wikis.

So, I guess I don’t just mean “Stop calling me.” I mean, communicate with me.

I mean choose the right tool for the right job. Becuase right now, I am just using the voice feature on my phone as a voicemail box. That’s all. Is that wrong?

When I think about all of the ways in which students are measured and monitored, it strikes me that very little of the measuring is being done by the students themselves. Now, I know that others have written on this topic more than I have, but as I was reading through Dan Meyer’s second annual contest for designing of annual reports, I realized that he was doing all of the things that I wished my students would do. I wish my students would collect all of the things that they had done and learned over the course of the year and then construct a report that reflected exactly what they had accomplished. This would not merely be a reflection exercise based upon an e-portfolio, it would be a way for students to prove that they really could quantify their learning.

Rather than us having to assess their learning and turn it into numbers, let’s ask them to do it. Let’s give them the tools and time to create something as beautiful as the Feltron Report. Let’s guide them through the process of figuring out how to make learning concrete. Let’s truly have an alternative to the one sheet for CSAP results as the easiest and most clear representation of the student’s learning.

For examples of great Annual reports, I turn to Dan’s contest from last year. Arthus (who sadly no longer blogs), is a student who was able to visualize his learning:

The level of articulation it takes to construct something truly reflective of a year’s worth of learning is immense. If we start teaching this skill to our children early on, I can’t imagine what they will be able to express.

So, my questions for this are as follows:

1. Is anyone doing this contest with students?
2. What would you have them collect data on throughout the year if you were going to do this (and where would you track it)?
3. What tools would be the easiest to have them express their learning?
4. How could you help them to design their reports so that they are not simple graphs of number of blog posts, etc?
5. What added reflection would you have them do upon completion of this activity?
6. Where would you post them?
7. When would you actually have them do this (end of the year, first of the year, throughout the year)?

I have been thinking a lot about this concept in preparation for The On Button: Instant and Always-On Collaboration, but I don’t know that I ever thought about it in terms of money or value lost… until now.

I believe in eliminating logins because you are walling off possiblilties for your community. I believe in eliminating logins because teachers don’t have enough time to remember yet another password. Logins don’t use the web the way it should be used, pouring feeds together, remixing content and sharing it out again.

Yet, this article seems to suggest that value is lost when logins are involved. When you have true value in your community, logins don’t matter. When you have something that really is “worth something”, putting it behind a login will only ensure that most people will never get at it.

Logins stop the collaborative process short. As much as I love my profile on Twitter and such, I believe that an identity is not tied to a login. I believe that an identity is bigger than a login. If we are creating the right kinds of spaces, with the right kind of respect and safety, we can simply tag our content with our identities, adding value rather than taking it away.

As much as I like this concept, it needs some more thought. I just wanted to share the link and ask the questions: What happens if we remove all of the logins from our lives?

(I also found the link from OL Daily. If you don’t subscribe to that daily goodness, go and do so.)

I hadn’t planned on blogging about this again this soon, but this post from Graham Wegner got me thinking about it again. In this post, he talks about “the popular public schools” that parents move for. He discusses the idea that popular doesn’t necessarily mean good. While I would agree with that, I am caught in the middle of my own process of trying to find the best school for my children. I really don’t think that there is anything wrong with moving to a specific area because of a school.

Being an informed consumer is not a vice.

However, I do agree with the fact that the schools with the best test scores or most popularity will not neccesarily provide the best total education for my kids. I know that there is so much that goes into a single student’s education, much of which is determined by how well he/she advocates for his/her own education.

Although I do believe that you can have a great educational experience at nearly any school, it is hard for me to get away from data and images like these:

vs.

What you see above is the difference in the Math achievement scores between the Cherry Creek School District, which is one of those “Popular Districts”, and the Denver School District, which for the most part is not. While I do believe in taking a look at the school environment and other factors, is it really any wonder that parents would flock to Cherry Creek? Is it really any wonder that they would want to have a better place for their children than maybe they even had for themselves.

So, when I am looking into creating a home for my family, I want the best that there is to offer them. This includes schools. I believe in the power of choice. I will be voting with my feet.

But, I don’t plan on giving up on the Denver schools either. That is what makes me different from many of the parents that Graham describes. While I may be working with my children’s schools to make sure that my kids get the best education possible. I would rather be able to get the kind of education I will get by moving, without moving. I would rather get a world class education anywhere. Is that too much to ask?

So, I was just watching some TV with my 6 month old son while my wife catches a nap, and I saw this ad for Kaplan:

I have to say, except for the fact that Kaplan is basically saying that they have a monopoly on these ideas, I really like the ad. Unfortunately, I’m not totally sure why a for-profit university beat the public school system to the punch. I’m not totally sure why we can’t run ads like this on television or the radio. Why is it that we cannot raise money to change education and then put these ideas out there without a brand associated with them. Why is it that these proposals are being co-opted faster in ad agencies and places like Kaplan then in school districts.

I can just see people using this video in their PD sessions and saying, “We should do this.” Yet, without a support system, they are going to turn to a one-stop-shop solution like a for-profit entity. I can’t help but feeling like this is already happening.

I remember a really great moment in a Podcast not to long ago (I think it was Kevin Honeycutt’s Driving Questions, but I’m not sure) when an interviewee said that the question he is always asking himself is, “Who is getting rich on education? If it isn’t the students, the teachers, or the public, then it isn’t worth paying for.” If the learners aren’t benefiting from the forward thinking of all institutions, then we need to seriously ante up again. So, if there is anyone who has a few thousand bucks lying around, I think it would totally be worth it to invest in some advertising time. But, instead of having the Kaplan tag line at the end, let’s have a link to a network of teachers that are actively pursuing change.

I do still have to give Kaplan credit, though. This is a great ad, and it is the kind of message that most people aren’t being exposed to. I just wish we would have done it first.

Today I was lucky enough to go and visit three Hope Online Sites in Denver. If you are unfamiliar with this program, basically it is a way for students to go to school using online currilum as a major part of their education. However, every single one of the “schools” that I visited today were completely different, and I really enjoed each one for different reasons.

The first one that I went to had an amazing elementary program. The teachers were supplimenting the online curriculum beautifully. One teacher/mentor had thousands of books for kids to choose from in a warm and cozy classroom. It was wonderful to see such thoughtfulness being used when trying to find a balence between computer time and offline time.

The second center I went to was high school only and they seemed to be very focused on getting the kids all of the health and mental services supports that they needed in order to help them graduate. They were much more interested in making sure the kid was safe and keeping their nose to the grindstone in order to ensure their success in the program. It did leave very little time for offline work, however.

The third center I saw was quite frankly one of the best run schools I have come across. They had a huge emphasis on professional development and ensuring that every kid was being tracked and looked after according to their individual needs. They taught arabic as the required language and the online component really only enhanced their already strong curriculum.

These are school choices in Colorado.

I guess I never knew that there were so many different ways that schools can look. Being so isolated in traditional schools, or even in an online school, I think I forget that education can really look different. Now, I would never say that all ways of educating students are good. Nor would I say that any one institution has got everything going right. What I would say, however, is that by looking at different ways of learning, I realize just how valuable choice is.

But, here is where my push for change comes in. I don’t want students and parents to only be making the choices school by school. I want them to be making the choices within every school. I want students to be able to choose an inclusing elementary classroom, a rigorous online middle school curriculum, and a free high school atmosphere (and every possible other combination too). I want students, parents and teachers to be able to design what kind of learning really is going to work for their students and I want all three stakeholders to feel supported in their decision.

I want to be able to make a singular student’s situation better within the school that they currently attend, rather than having them opt in to a different school. But how do we do that? How is it that we can help schools to be able to do everything, to be all things to all kids?

I have been given the task of trying to find ways to pump up kids who are not all that excited about standardized tests. I am supposed to put together a quick reference guide for others who are experiencing a less than enthusiastic response to the CSAP test which comes upon us every March.

The questions I have about this are as follows:

1. Is it possible to excite kids about standardized testing?
2. Is it important or valuable to excited kids about standardized testing?

I know that it is possible to get kids excited about learning. I have seen kids take on extra responsiblities in order to learn more. I have seen students literally leap out of their chairs because they wanted to voice their opinion or had a writing piece to share. Is it really possible to get kids excited about working diligently on an assessment of their learning? Is it really possible to make sitting in a desk and filling in bubbles authentic? (I would say, no… but that isn’t what I am being charged with, is it?)

So, how valuable is it to get kids excited about CSAP? Well, the scores directly relate to school funding, so perhaps it is very important to get kids excited. Perhaps it is justified. Perhaps creating videos to prove that a system needs its kids are completely worth it:

Or, is it possible, that we are going about this all wrong. Is it possible that we are trying to gift wrap a process that is inherently filled with flaws so that we don’t have to deal with those flaws. Is it possible that creating these sorts of resources is simply putting off the difficult work of changing the way we assess students? Is our creativity and resource finding prolonging the life of a process we want nothing to do with?

Or, are we just making Standardized tests a little bit easier to swallow?

Maybe a bit of both. Either way, I’m pretty sure I still have to do the assignment. If anyone has a way to make CSAP more exciting, let me know.

One of the large tasks that I am doing right now is taking all of the courses that our online school taught during the first semester of this year and revising them according to the changes that the teachers made while teaching them. This means that I am copying over any assessments or assignments made, revising any activities introduced and pretty much making sure that every piece of learning is coherent with the next one. While this may seem like a huge undertaking that might not be all that much fun (which, at times, it is), I wonder how many of us are really in a position to look at curriculm this closely. How many of us really get to say that we are revising learning, taking what has gone before and forever changing it into something that works better.

Now, I wish I could say that I did that in my own classroom. I wish I could say that every year I was able to change my curriculum so that it stayed “changed for the better” after I left. However, that could not be further from the truth.

While I was at my previous school, I was able to go from one blogging unit (6 weeks long) to a fully integrated blogging/writing curriculum with teachers and students blogging together on our team. Well, within a few months of my leaving, I realized that the team was no longer using much of the systems that I had set up. Because I wasn’t there to constantly push forward, many of the students and teachers simply reverted back to what they were doing before I joined the team. That is not to say that I did not create a great deal of change, but that the changes were not lasting, at least not in all of the ways I had hoped.

So, what I am proposing now, is that if we are going to make things better in the long term within schools, we must be able to archive everything that we have done and continue to revise it and make it more polished so that if we should ever need to take leave of that role, other can pick up where we left off.

I guess all of the learning objects and project wikis are not enough. We must package learning for others, allowing them to copy it and improve upon it. We must revise our learning continually so that everyone can see the edits we have made and the direction we would like to go.

As much as I might dislike going through each lesson of our online school with a fine tooth comb, I know that it is the only way in which we will get better. I know that any change I make, is one that will stick, one that will make that next change easier.

(As I am reading this post back to myself, I realize how mad I am at myself for not ensuring that more of the work I had done would stick. I really didn’t know how much I was leaving behind…)

I would like to explore if only for a moment the idea that we are all in a major budget crunch. As much as I would like to make a joke about the fact that this is only fantasy, I know that it is head-aching reality for many of us.

With shrinking budget and possibly some layoffs in nearly every educational institution, it is hard for me not to consider just how we can make sure that change doesn’t get taken off the table when the important decisions get made. So, here is my plan:

I propse that we don’t create anything that isn’t scalable (although this isn’t directly related to Stephen Downes idea of what not to create in 2009, I think I should mention it here.). I propose that we don’t create things that require huge amounts of people to maintain. I propose that we don’t build any website, forum, community, blog, portal, LMS, CMS, aggregator, or repository if it only works at a small level or requires huge amounts of time and effort to coninue to expand.

As much as I would like to make sure that I continue to be useful to all of the projects that I create, I would like to stop working on things that require me as part of them in order to work. I would like to make me obsolete as many times as I possibly can. I would like to build self-sustaining learning networks and portals that people do not need to keep on troubleshooting. In fact, every project that I now undergo should follow this plan:

I’m not sure that there is much else to it. If I am building things that require more and more of my time, there truly will never be enough time for everything, and then all movement toward change stops. With all of the downsizing going on, I have a feeling that all programs that aren’t scalable and require specific people are the ones that are most likely to kick the bucket. This may seem counterintuitive. It may seem like by making yourself indespensible to a particular program, you are ensuring that you have a job in the future. Rather, you are just making your program more easy to eliminate, taking you with it.

By making all projects scalable, you can not be tied to any one of them. By continually building new environments and learning more and more from the connections around you, it is possible to become so valuable for your strategies for creating learning that you must be a part of them. Or, at least, that is the hope.