I give all of the credit for this podcast to my amazing students. They were the ones that kept a debate on intellectual property, remixing, and mash-ups going for nearly thirty minutes. They were the ones that came up with the amazing examples to support their points. They were also the ones to inspire many thoughts on creating rules for how we use content in the classroom.
I am now convinced that each classroom of students should decide for themselves just what they want to be done with their content. Should teachers be able to use it for next year’s class? Should teachers remix their content into more polished work? We need to be asking the students to come up with what their own boundaries for intellectual property are, and we need to be teaching them where the boundaries are drawn already.
I have decided to split this podcast up into about 40 chapters because that is how many different ideas were thrown around (mostly by different students). I have attached each student’s blog to the chapters in which they spoke. The one request I have is that you comment on this post and tell us which side won the debate. (Although, I’m sure my students wouldn’t mind if you commented on some of their blog posts either.)
- 00:00:00: Introduction of Debate
Yongesonne’s Blog - 00:01:32: Against 1: Giving credit and making money
Silver Lining’s blog - 00:02:50: Pro 1: Remix means new thought
Hockey90’s blog - 00:03:28: Against 2: New content is new thought
- 00:04:08: Pro 2: Building upon an idea is valuable
Nextmj1’s blog - 00:04:55: Against 3: Permission means remix ability
Denalirott53’s blog - 00:05:43: Pro 3: Art for art’s sake
Dancingintherain’s blog - 00:06:31: Against 4: Profit, Author choice, and Talent
C4d1ll4c’s blog - 00:07:20: Pro 4: Artist vs. Producer
Ferrari49’s blog - 00:08:15: Against 5: Who owns the art?
Helamanswarrior100’s blog - 00:09:56: Pro 5: Remix happens no matter what
- 00:10:55: Against 6: Who does a remix benefit?
Goldenluckycharm12’s blog - 00:11:45: Pro 6: Listener’s choice and Profit
Hellomynameisbill77’s blog - 00:12:14: Against 7: Remixing as disrespect
Sandyanteater’s Blog - 00:12:46: Pro 7: Remix as improvement
Ismellpretzels’s blog - 00:13:23: Against 8: Long-term effects of remix
Snowboardinghockeyplayer3’s blog - 00:14:03: Pro 8: Remix as personalization
Mrengland’s blog - 00:14:45: Against 9: New content vs. Remixed content
- 00:15:32: Pro 9: Remix as publicity
Nextmj1’s blog - 00:16:29: Against 10: Artist ownership
Puffinsaresosweet’s blog - 00:17:08: Pro 10: Remix as originality
Bazookabubblegum’s blog - 00:17:47: Against 11: Losing artist intent in remix
C4d1ll4c’s blog - 00:18:14: Pro 11: Remixing binders
Rockinwithacdc12’s blog - 00:19:14: Against 12: Remix as changing context
Denalirott53’s blog - 00:19:47: Against 13: Happy middle-ground
- 00:20:39: Against 14: Artist rights
Rubyredslippers’ blog - 00:21:10: Against 15: Artist responsibility to remix
Snowboardinghockeyplayer3’s blog - 00:21:37: Against 16: Selfish remixes
Moose’s blog - 00:22:01: Against 17: Losing work in remixes
Roadrunner19937’s blog - 00:22:30: Pro 12: Remix as perfection
Hellomynameisbill77’s blog - 00:23:05: Pro 13: Cars are remixes
Ferrari49’s blog - 00:24:09: Pro 14: Remix as entertainment
- 00:24:48: Pro 15: Change is good
Dancingintherain’s blog - 00:25:25: Pro 16: Knowing the originators
Ismellpretzels’ blog - 00:25:49: Pro 17: Remix as connection
Acdcrocks10’s blog - 00:26:29: Against 18: Original thought is perfection
Denalirott53′ blog - 00:26:49: Against 19: Knowing all sources
Sandyanteater’s blog - 00:27:10: Against 20: Remixing context
Moose’s Blog - 00:27:56: Against 21: Personalization should stay personal
- 00:28:08: Conclusion of Debate
Podcast Blog