I was just looking at the iPD Metadata project, and I am finding it more interesting than I had originally. Here are the categories that they are considering tagging all PD with, including the original language for the sub-categories. How do we think these align with our frameworks?
Instructional Strategies
â Facilitating Small Groups
â Whole Group Instruction
â Using Discussion Protocols
â Questioning Strategies
â Differentiation-Scaffolding
â Engaging All Learners
â Gradual Release of Responsibility
â Domain Specific Thinking Skills
â Delivering Instruction
â Facilitating Learning
Learning Environment
â Classroom Management
â Discipline
â Rules
â Rewards and Punishments
â Intrinsic Motivators
â Family Engagement
â Establishing a Productive Classroom
â Managing a Productive Classroom
Assessment
â Feedback Loops
â Portfolio
â 7 Cs of Learning Design (conceptualize, capture, collaborate, consider, combine, consolidate)
â Formative
â Summative
â Exit Slips
â Informal
â Formal
â Looking at Student Work
â Data-Driven Decision Making
â Data Analysis
â Monitoring Student Learning
â Responding to Student Learning
Instructional Planning
â Lesson Design
â Inquiry
â Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC)
â Mathematics Design Collaborative (MDC)
â Duration
â Standards
â Understanding by Design (UBD)
â Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
â Reflection
â Unit Design
â Identifying Resources
Professional Commitments
â Coaching
â Observing and Providing Feedback
â Presenting
â Publishing
â Facilitating
â Advocacy
â Collaboration
â Case Management
â Communicating Effectively
â Continuous Improvement of Teaching
â Instructional Leadership
Here is the link to the overall project.
Theress Pidick, Danielle Ongart, and Justin Darnell, what do you think?
