Anything that can be archived, should be.
I was teaching yesterday using xtranormal (http://www.xtranormal.com/profile/horizon) and edmodo. I found myself trying to justify why I wanted to archive all of the learning going on in the room. As if somehow there were people watching and asking why I was doing what I was doing.
I waited, but no one asked the question.
In the end I want people to challenge my thinking. I want other teachers to ask what the virtue of chronicling all of the thoughts of students is. This is what I would have said, if anyone had put my pedagogy to the test:
Learning is not tangible. It isn’t something that all students just come to and recognize easily. It must be made visual and reflective. It must be made into an object to be manipulated. If we are not archiving everything for our students (or if they aren’t doing it themselves), how will they ever be able to say “I can use this.” If it we don’t save our students thinking, how can we ever know that it really happened? How can we know if they or we did a job woth doing?
Learning is not for a day or a class period. We need to stop treating it like it were.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
Posted via email from olco5′s posterous
-
http://www.converstations.com Mike Sansone
-
Ben Wilkoff
Tags
Recent Comments
- Ben Wilkoff on Question 230 of 365: What is a proportionate response?
- Travel in the sky › Groundhog Day, or, the Problem with A/B Testing on Question 22 of 365: Farmville practices Ghetto Testing, why aren’t we?
- Ben Wilkoff on Question 218 of 365: How crippling is indecision?
- Jacqueline L Cahill on Question 218 of 365: How crippling is indecision?
- Jacqueline L Cahill on Question 229 of 365: Who started it?





