Condensation
I was at a restaurant this morning with my family and my wife’s
fingers were getting stickier and stickier from the leaky maple syrup
container. After a while she started looking for some water to wash
them off with. Her water cup was empty but the condensation on the
outside was still there so she used it to clean her hands.
I’m not sure why this sparked something in me, but the act of her
using only the water that was on the outside of the glass made me
think of what is happening in many school districts that I see around
me.
We can see the water, the life giving liquid inside, but we have to
settle for the small beads collecting around the outer edge.
We know that the bandwidth that is needed to fully share with one
another the media, ideas and resources of our district is available.
It exists for businesses and other entities out there, but in
education we are stuck with the runoff from those large high speed
pipes.
We need a straw, but we are stuck licking at the glass.
(The preceding metaphor is stretched pretty thin, but I did want to
get it out there just in case someone else found it useful.)
Comment on Educational Insanity’s Blog post
This blog post is taken from a comment I wrote on Educational Insanity’s blog post, Reflections from NECC – Equity, Diversity, Social Justice. I thought is was important enough to repeat it here.
I really appreciate your honest assessment of NECC 2008. Although I cannot be there in person (my wife is ready to give birth any day now), I did want to show support for sessions that discuss issues of diversity, equity, and social justice. I’m not sure how to deal with the (perceived?) lack of racial diversity in the edublogosphere or at the Blogger’s Cafe, but I do think that we need to be reaching out. Do you know if Taking It Global (http://takingitglobal.org) is doing a session at NECC? Getting someone from that organization to come into the Blogging arena of NECC would go a long way to ushering in an air of social justice and diversity.
The other question I have is about the diversity of the conference in general. If there is a lack of diversity (or at least a lack of people talking about it), is that because the people that are attending are mostly getting their school districts to pay for it? If a school district cannot buy books (as is the case in the documentary that you just mentioned, which I hadn’t heard of because I don’t get HBO… Is there some other way I can see it?), how can they send teachers to a (fairly) pricey conference.
Talk about equity, the conference should have scholarships for districts that are looking to be forward thinking, but don’t have the funds. (Is this something that is possible.)
I would love to have a larger debate in the edubloggosphere about the issues of equity, diversity, and social justice, but I wonder how valuable it can be for a white folks (of which I am one) to debate the issues without getting some voices outside of the echo chamber to take part. Any ideas?
The Great Remix Debate
March 28, 2007 04:56AM
I give all of the credit for this podcast to my amazing students. They were the ones that kept a debate on intellectual property, remixing, and mash-ups going for nearly thirty minutes. They were the ones that came up with the amazing examples to support their points. They were also the ones to inspire many thoughts on creating rules for how we use content in the classroom. I am now convinced that each classroom of students should decide for themselves just what they want to be done with their content. Should teachers be able to use it for next year’s class? Should teachers remix their content into more polished work? We need to be asking the students to come up with what their own boundaries for intellectual property are, and we need to be teaching them where the boundaries are drawn already. I have decided to split this podcast up into about 40 chapters because that is how many different ideas were thrown around (mostly by different students). I have attached each student’s blog to the chapters in which they spoke. The one request I have is that you comment on this post and tell us which side won the debate. (Although, I’m sure my students wouldn’t mind if you commented on some of their blog posts either.)
- 00:00:00: Introduction of Debate
Yongesonne’s Blog - 00:01:32: Against 1: Giving credit and making money
Silver Lining’s blog - 00:02:50: Pro 1: Remix means new thought
Hockey90′s blog - 00:03:28: Against 2: New content is new thought
Moose’s blog - 00:04:08: Pro 2: Building upon an idea is valuable
Nextmj1′s blog - 00:04:55: Against 3: Permission means remix ability
Denalirott53′s blog - 00:05:43: Pro 3: Art for art’s sake
Dancingintherain’s blog - 00:06:31: Against 4: Profit, Author choice, and Talent
C4d1ll4c’s blog - 00:07:20: Pro 4: Artist vs. Producer
Ferrari49′s blog - 00:08:15: Against 5: Who owns the art?
Helamanswarrior100′s blog - 00:09:56: Pro 5: Remix happens no matter what
Sanje86′s blog - 00:10:55: Against 6: Who does a remix benefit?
Goldenluckycharm12′s blog - 00:11:45: Pro 6: Listener’s choice and Profit
Hellomynameisbill77′s blog - 00:12:14: Against 7: Remixing as disrespect
Sandyanteater’s Blog - 00:12:46: Pro 7: Remix as improvement
Ismellpretzels’s blog - 00:13:23: Against 8: Long-term effects of remix
Snowboardinghockeyplayer3′s blog - 00:14:03: Pro 8: Remix as personalization
Mrengland’s blog - 00:14:45: Against 9: New content vs. Remixed content
Rbsmm743′s blog - 00:15:32: Pro 9: Remix as publicity
Nextmj1′s blog - 00:16:29: Against 10: Artist ownership
Puffinsaresosweet’s blog - 00:17:08: Pro 10: Remix as originality
Bazookabubblegum’s blog - 00:17:47: Against 11: Losing artist intent in remix
C4d1ll4c’s blog - 00:18:14: Pro 11: Remixing binders
Rockinwithacdc12′s blog - 00:19:14: Against 12: Remix as changing context
Denalirott53′s blog - 00:19:47: Against 13: Happy middle-ground
Goldenluckycharm12′s blog - 00:20:39: Against 14: Artist rights
Rubyredslippers’ blog - 00:21:10: Against 15: Artist responsibility to remix
Snowboardinghockeyplayer3′s blog - 00:21:37: Against 16: Selfish remixes
Moose’s blog - 00:22:01: Against 17: Losing work in remixes
Roadrunner19937′s blog - 00:22:30: Pro 12: Remix as perfection
Hellomynameisbill77′s blog - 00:23:05: Pro 13: Cars are remixes
Ferrari49′s blog - 00:24:09: Pro 14: Remix as entertainment
Mrengland’s blog - 00:24:48: Pro 15: Change is good
Dancingintherain’s blog - 00:25:25: Pro 16: Knowing the originators
Ismellpretzels’ blog - 00:25:49: Pro 17: Remix as connection
Acdcrocks10′s blog - 00:26:29: Against 18: Original thought is perfection
Denalirott53′ blog - 00:26:49: Against 19: Knowing all sources
Sandyanteater’s blog - 00:27:10: Against 20: Remixing context
Moose’s Blog - 00:27:56: Against 21: Personalization should stay personal
Snowboardinghockeyplayer3′s blog - 00:28:08: Conclusion of Debate
Podcast Blog
The Great Remix Debate

I give all of the credit for this podcast to my amazing students. They were the ones that kept a debate on intellectual property, remixing, and mash-ups going for nearly thirty minutes. They were the ones that came up with the amazing examples to support their points. They were also the ones to inspire many thoughts on creating rules for how we use content in the classroom.
I am now convinced that each classroom of students should decide for themselves just what they want to be done with their content. Should teachers be able to use it for next year’s class? Should teachers remix their content into more polished work? We need to be asking the students to come up with what their own boundaries for intellectual property are, and we need to be teaching them where the boundaries are drawn already.
I have decided to split this podcast up into about 40 chapters because that is how many different ideas were thrown around (mostly by different students). I have attached each student’s blog to the chapters in which they spoke. The one request I have is that you comment on this post and tell us which side won the debate. (Although, I’m sure my students wouldn’t mind if you commented on some of their blog posts either.)
- 00:00:00: Introduction of Debate
Yongesonne’s Blog - 00:01:32: Against 1: Giving credit and making money
Silver Lining’s blog - 00:02:50: Pro 1: Remix means new thought
Hockey90′s blog - 00:03:28: Against 2: New content is new thought
- 00:04:08: Pro 2: Building upon an idea is valuable
Nextmj1′s blog - 00:04:55: Against 3: Permission means remix ability
Denalirott53′s blog - 00:05:43: Pro 3: Art for art’s sake
Dancingintherain’s blog - 00:06:31: Against 4: Profit, Author choice, and Talent
C4d1ll4c’s blog - 00:07:20: Pro 4: Artist vs. Producer
Ferrari49′s blog - 00:08:15: Against 5: Who owns the art?
Helamanswarrior100′s blog - 00:09:56: Pro 5: Remix happens no matter what
- 00:10:55: Against 6: Who does a remix benefit?
Goldenluckycharm12′s blog - 00:11:45: Pro 6: Listener’s choice and Profit
Hellomynameisbill77′s blog - 00:12:14: Against 7: Remixing as disrespect
Sandyanteater’s Blog - 00:12:46: Pro 7: Remix as improvement
Ismellpretzels’s blog - 00:13:23: Against 8: Long-term effects of remix
Snowboardinghockeyplayer3′s blog - 00:14:03: Pro 8: Remix as personalization
Mrengland’s blog - 00:14:45: Against 9: New content vs. Remixed content
- 00:15:32: Pro 9: Remix as publicity
Nextmj1′s blog - 00:16:29: Against 10: Artist ownership
Puffinsaresosweet’s blog - 00:17:08: Pro 10: Remix as originality
Bazookabubblegum’s blog - 00:17:47: Against 11: Losing artist intent in remix
C4d1ll4c’s blog - 00:18:14: Pro 11: Remixing binders
Rockinwithacdc12′s blog - 00:19:14: Against 12: Remix as changing context
Denalirott53′s blog - 00:19:47: Against 13: Happy middle-ground
- 00:20:39: Against 14: Artist rights
Rubyredslippers’ blog - 00:21:10: Against 15: Artist responsibility to remix
Snowboardinghockeyplayer3′s blog - 00:21:37: Against 16: Selfish remixes
Moose’s blog - 00:22:01: Against 17: Losing work in remixes
Roadrunner19937′s blog - 00:22:30: Pro 12: Remix as perfection
Hellomynameisbill77′s blog - 00:23:05: Pro 13: Cars are remixes
Ferrari49′s blog - 00:24:09: Pro 14: Remix as entertainment
- 00:24:48: Pro 15: Change is good
Dancingintherain’s blog - 00:25:25: Pro 16: Knowing the originators
Ismellpretzels’ blog - 00:25:49: Pro 17: Remix as connection
Acdcrocks10′s blog - 00:26:29: Against 18: Original thought is perfection
Denalirott53′ blog - 00:26:49: Against 19: Knowing all sources
Sandyanteater’s blog - 00:27:10: Against 20: Remixing context
Moose’s Blog - 00:27:56: Against 21: Personalization should stay personal
- 00:28:08: Conclusion of Debate
Podcast Blog
Tags
Recent Comments
- Michael Wacker on Start Google Documents or Upload Files to Google Docs with an email.
- coursework on What I’m Learning: Hall.com
- essay writing service on What I’m Learning: Hall.com
- custom essays on Question 365 of 365: What is enough?
- resume help on What I’m Learning: How to make a secondary Google Calendar into a primary Calendar on iCal
Blog Post Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | ||||






