Community requires tending.

George Orwell’s Animal Farm is a story mostly about tyranny and the corruption of utopian ideals, but in the very beginning there is a passage that means something very different to me. It deals with the leadership of Mr. Jones before the rebellion, before the animals decide to take the farm into their own hands.
“The fields were full of weeds, the buildings wanted roofing, the hedges were neglected, and the animals were underfed.”
This quotation represents all of the things that happen when Mr. Jones gets too distracted to work, to maintain his environment, and to make life better for all those involved. To me, this is about not tending the community. It is about letting things lie fallow which must be uprooted and overturned to see what is underneath them.
Our communities are just like this I think, both in our classroom and outside of them. The communities within our classroom, especially the collaborative ones that we are all striving for, require an immense amount of tending. The Discovery Utopia wiki that my students are working on (and the reason that we are reading Animal Farm in the first place) is not an exception. If I do not constantly draw attention to the great things that are going on there, the community seems to just pass right on by them. If I do not look for the troubling points, the issues that nearly every student seems to be struggling with, students stop using the community. They find other ways to occupy their time. And that is one of the most interesting parts about our communities. They are communities of choice.
All communities of choice are ones that can be thriving in one minute and vacant in the next. So, how do we tend for consistency? Well, we feed the animals (is it weird that I am referring to my students as animals). We put up new buildings for them to play in. We design the space so that it is inviting and provokes the best kind of authentic creativity: their own.
I think that the lesson is pretty clear. If we do not tend to our communities, they will fail. The inhabitants will rebel and either stop using them, or turn them into something that rejects their purpose. And, if Animal Farm is any indication, the inhabitants of a untended community will become just like us and not tend to their communities. I mean that in both a virtual and real-world sense.
I hope this comes across as something other than a Language Arts teacher’s metaphorical analysis.
Learning 2.0: The Colorado Conversation (The Reminder)

My anticipation is rising. The time is drawing near when Learning 2.0 will be here. I will not attempt to recreate Karl’s amazingly concise post (if you have read my blog for any length of time, you will know that brevity is not always my first priority).
The purpose of this post is just to keep the awareness at an all time high that things are happening in Colorado. We aren’t trying to be the EdTech mecca, just to have a unified (whatever that means) voice for change. Let’s see what happens.
“Just a reminder for those of you attending – either physically or virtually – that Learning 2.0: A Colorado Conversation is coming up this Saturday, February 23rd, from 9:00 am – 2:30 pm MST. If you registered, you should’ve received this email a few days ago with some updated information. And here’s the schedule for the day’s activities.
For those of you interested in attending virtually, we will be attempting to Ustream the seven sessions – channel info here.
Please keep in mind that our first priority is pulling off the physical
conference, so if the Ustream happens it will be a bonus, but we’re
going to give it a shot.
We have about 170 folks registered,
although I imagine a few will change their minds at the last minute.
The weather looks like it’s going to cooperate, everything is planned
out and we think (emphasis on think) we’ve thought of everything. It’s going to be interesting . . .”
The Great Remix Debate
March 28, 2007 04:56AM
I give all of the credit for this podcast to my amazing students. They were the ones that kept a debate on intellectual property, remixing, and mash-ups going for nearly thirty minutes. They were the ones that came up with the amazing examples to support their points. They were also the ones to inspire many thoughts on creating rules for how we use content in the classroom. I am now convinced that each classroom of students should decide for themselves just what they want to be done with their content. Should teachers be able to use it for next year’s class? Should teachers remix their content into more polished work? We need to be asking the students to come up with what their own boundaries for intellectual property are, and we need to be teaching them where the boundaries are drawn already. I have decided to split this podcast up into about 40 chapters because that is how many different ideas were thrown around (mostly by different students). I have attached each student’s blog to the chapters in which they spoke. The one request I have is that you comment on this post and tell us which side won the debate. (Although, I’m sure my students wouldn’t mind if you commented on some of their blog posts either.)
- 00:00:00: Introduction of Debate
Yongesonne’s Blog - 00:01:32: Against 1: Giving credit and making money
Silver Lining’s blog - 00:02:50: Pro 1: Remix means new thought
Hockey90′s blog - 00:03:28: Against 2: New content is new thought
Moose’s blog - 00:04:08: Pro 2: Building upon an idea is valuable
Nextmj1′s blog - 00:04:55: Against 3: Permission means remix ability
Denalirott53′s blog - 00:05:43: Pro 3: Art for art’s sake
Dancingintherain’s blog - 00:06:31: Against 4: Profit, Author choice, and Talent
C4d1ll4c’s blog - 00:07:20: Pro 4: Artist vs. Producer
Ferrari49′s blog - 00:08:15: Against 5: Who owns the art?
Helamanswarrior100′s blog - 00:09:56: Pro 5: Remix happens no matter what
Sanje86′s blog - 00:10:55: Against 6: Who does a remix benefit?
Goldenluckycharm12′s blog - 00:11:45: Pro 6: Listener’s choice and Profit
Hellomynameisbill77′s blog - 00:12:14: Against 7: Remixing as disrespect
Sandyanteater’s Blog - 00:12:46: Pro 7: Remix as improvement
Ismellpretzels’s blog - 00:13:23: Against 8: Long-term effects of remix
Snowboardinghockeyplayer3′s blog - 00:14:03: Pro 8: Remix as personalization
Mrengland’s blog - 00:14:45: Against 9: New content vs. Remixed content
Rbsmm743′s blog - 00:15:32: Pro 9: Remix as publicity
Nextmj1′s blog - 00:16:29: Against 10: Artist ownership
Puffinsaresosweet’s blog - 00:17:08: Pro 10: Remix as originality
Bazookabubblegum’s blog - 00:17:47: Against 11: Losing artist intent in remix
C4d1ll4c’s blog - 00:18:14: Pro 11: Remixing binders
Rockinwithacdc12′s blog - 00:19:14: Against 12: Remix as changing context
Denalirott53′s blog - 00:19:47: Against 13: Happy middle-ground
Goldenluckycharm12′s blog - 00:20:39: Against 14: Artist rights
Rubyredslippers’ blog - 00:21:10: Against 15: Artist responsibility to remix
Snowboardinghockeyplayer3′s blog - 00:21:37: Against 16: Selfish remixes
Moose’s blog - 00:22:01: Against 17: Losing work in remixes
Roadrunner19937′s blog - 00:22:30: Pro 12: Remix as perfection
Hellomynameisbill77′s blog - 00:23:05: Pro 13: Cars are remixes
Ferrari49′s blog - 00:24:09: Pro 14: Remix as entertainment
Mrengland’s blog - 00:24:48: Pro 15: Change is good
Dancingintherain’s blog - 00:25:25: Pro 16: Knowing the originators
Ismellpretzels’ blog - 00:25:49: Pro 17: Remix as connection
Acdcrocks10′s blog - 00:26:29: Against 18: Original thought is perfection
Denalirott53′ blog - 00:26:49: Against 19: Knowing all sources
Sandyanteater’s blog - 00:27:10: Against 20: Remixing context
Moose’s Blog - 00:27:56: Against 21: Personalization should stay personal
Snowboardinghockeyplayer3′s blog - 00:28:08: Conclusion of Debate
Podcast Blog
The Embedded Classroom

The two wiki project that my students have started to work on have taught me that an open framework that allows for embedded materials is preferable to any all-in-one solution that tries to do too much at once. I also would like to apply this concept to my classroom in a concrete way. My students should be able to embed their knowledge and experience into the framework of the classroom. They should be allowed to use whatever service/method they can to prove that they have learned something.
Show Notes and Links:
- 00:00:00: Introduction to The Embedded Classroom
The Podcast Blog - 00:00:29: Wiki Project 1: Utopias/Dystopias
The Discovery Utopias - 00:03:42: Wiki Project 2: -Isms
The Discovery -Isms - 00:04:21: A Content Management System
- 00:07:02: The Framework for Embedding
Example Embed - 00:09:44: The Metaphor for Embedding
- 00:12:36: The Drawbacks of All-In-One CMS
- 00:14:27: Pulling Spaces Together
Grazr - 00:16:32: Conlcusion
My Blog
The Great Remix Debate

I give all of the credit for this podcast to my amazing students. They were the ones that kept a debate on intellectual property, remixing, and mash-ups going for nearly thirty minutes. They were the ones that came up with the amazing examples to support their points. They were also the ones to inspire many thoughts on creating rules for how we use content in the classroom.
I am now convinced that each classroom of students should decide for themselves just what they want to be done with their content. Should teachers be able to use it for next year’s class? Should teachers remix their content into more polished work? We need to be asking the students to come up with what their own boundaries for intellectual property are, and we need to be teaching them where the boundaries are drawn already.
I have decided to split this podcast up into about 40 chapters because that is how many different ideas were thrown around (mostly by different students). I have attached each student’s blog to the chapters in which they spoke. The one request I have is that you comment on this post and tell us which side won the debate. (Although, I’m sure my students wouldn’t mind if you commented on some of their blog posts either.)
- 00:00:00: Introduction of Debate
Yongesonne’s Blog - 00:01:32: Against 1: Giving credit and making money
Silver Lining’s blog - 00:02:50: Pro 1: Remix means new thought
Hockey90′s blog - 00:03:28: Against 2: New content is new thought
- 00:04:08: Pro 2: Building upon an idea is valuable
Nextmj1′s blog - 00:04:55: Against 3: Permission means remix ability
Denalirott53′s blog - 00:05:43: Pro 3: Art for art’s sake
Dancingintherain’s blog - 00:06:31: Against 4: Profit, Author choice, and Talent
C4d1ll4c’s blog - 00:07:20: Pro 4: Artist vs. Producer
Ferrari49′s blog - 00:08:15: Against 5: Who owns the art?
Helamanswarrior100′s blog - 00:09:56: Pro 5: Remix happens no matter what
- 00:10:55: Against 6: Who does a remix benefit?
Goldenluckycharm12′s blog - 00:11:45: Pro 6: Listener’s choice and Profit
Hellomynameisbill77′s blog - 00:12:14: Against 7: Remixing as disrespect
Sandyanteater’s Blog - 00:12:46: Pro 7: Remix as improvement
Ismellpretzels’s blog - 00:13:23: Against 8: Long-term effects of remix
Snowboardinghockeyplayer3′s blog - 00:14:03: Pro 8: Remix as personalization
Mrengland’s blog - 00:14:45: Against 9: New content vs. Remixed content
- 00:15:32: Pro 9: Remix as publicity
Nextmj1′s blog - 00:16:29: Against 10: Artist ownership
Puffinsaresosweet’s blog - 00:17:08: Pro 10: Remix as originality
Bazookabubblegum’s blog - 00:17:47: Against 11: Losing artist intent in remix
C4d1ll4c’s blog - 00:18:14: Pro 11: Remixing binders
Rockinwithacdc12′s blog - 00:19:14: Against 12: Remix as changing context
Denalirott53′s blog - 00:19:47: Against 13: Happy middle-ground
- 00:20:39: Against 14: Artist rights
Rubyredslippers’ blog - 00:21:10: Against 15: Artist responsibility to remix
Snowboardinghockeyplayer3′s blog - 00:21:37: Against 16: Selfish remixes
Moose’s blog - 00:22:01: Against 17: Losing work in remixes
Roadrunner19937′s blog - 00:22:30: Pro 12: Remix as perfection
Hellomynameisbill77′s blog - 00:23:05: Pro 13: Cars are remixes
Ferrari49′s blog - 00:24:09: Pro 14: Remix as entertainment
- 00:24:48: Pro 15: Change is good
Dancingintherain’s blog - 00:25:25: Pro 16: Knowing the originators
Ismellpretzels’ blog - 00:25:49: Pro 17: Remix as connection
Acdcrocks10′s blog - 00:26:29: Against 18: Original thought is perfection
Denalirott53′ blog - 00:26:49: Against 19: Knowing all sources
Sandyanteater’s blog - 00:27:10: Against 20: Remixing context
Moose’s Blog - 00:27:56: Against 21: Personalization should stay personal
- 00:28:08: Conclusion of Debate
Podcast Blog
Tags
Recent Comments
- Michael Wacker on Start Google Documents or Upload Files to Google Docs with an email.
- coursework on What I’m Learning: Hall.com
- essay writing service on What I’m Learning: Hall.com
- custom essays on Question 365 of 365: What is enough?
- resume help on What I’m Learning: How to make a secondary Google Calendar into a primary Calendar on iCal
Blog Post Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | ||||






