Home Posts tagged "LMS"
formats

Not knowing what I can share

Published on June 6, 2009, by in Uncategorized.

For a week or more I have been conflicted about knowing what I can share from a class I co-taught this week on Best Practices for Online teaching and learning (yes, I know that I have blogged about there being no such thing as “best practices”). The reason why I am conflicted is because I do not own all of the rights to the content within the course and I have never tried to share the work of other adults amongst whom some are reluctant to have open classrooms. Because my district would like to take a look at running this course again and again internally and eventually running it for other districts as well, it would be hard for me to share the actual content of the course that I co-created (with my good friend Liz Walhof).

This saddens me because I am the type of person who has to share what is going on, has to add value to the work that is going on in changing the way education works. I really would like to share just how a hybrid course can look for professional development (we met on Monday, had asynchronous learning on Tuesday and met again on Wednesday with an extended skype session). I would like to share just how excited I am for people getting down to the business of making authentic learning objects with students and using Personal Learning Networks within an LMS. However, I respect the fact that I am not the only one who took part in the creation or learning of this class. I realize that I do not have all of the answers on this blog as well.

So, what I have decided to is to is to slowly take bits and pieces of things that I have learned from the course as well as things that were created during the course and share them on this blog. By doing this, I can satisfy my need to share as well as fulfill my obligations to show that there is valuable content within the course itself.

Here is the first set of objects, three visual representations of PLNs by members of this class:

picture-3picture-2picture-1

I quite like how this activity turned out. I hope you do too.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
formats

When is a book, not a book?

Published on May 12, 2009, by in Uncategorized.
A graphical despiction of a very simple html d...
Image via Wikipedia

I believe that I have been looking for this capability for a solid year, but I was only able to figure it out today. It can be described most easily as: Converting a folder of html files into a format that can be edited and manipulated by an LMS.

Before today, these were the things that I tried:

  1. Creating an iFrame embed for each important file and reconstructing a navigation for those files
  2. Linking to the files on a webserver and hoping for the best
  3. Importing individual files to Google Docs and then fixing all of the broken images and links. (This allows for editing easily as long as you are signed into your google account, but it is a lot of extra work to create the files)
  4. Researching the heck out of nearly every online hosting solution that integrates with an LMS to no avail.

Today, however, was a different story.

Today I found this.

It is a book module for Moodle, but really it is more than that. It is the single largest time saver I have ever run into. I can select a folder that I have uploaded to the Site Files and it will import all of the HTML, remake the relative links into links within the book itself, and rework all image files to work within the book. It creates a tree structure for the files. It allows you to print the entire book or only one chapter, and you can even export the entire thing as a IMS file (a standard format for elearning resources).

So, now I can go from HTML that has do be downloaded, edited offline, and uploaded again into a single editable (IMS compliant) book that can be enhanced with pretty much anything you can create on a webpage. If you would like to see an example, here is what the first semester of our Algebra Course looks like.

I can think of about a hundred different reasons why this is a good thing for teachers to be able to do with their content, but I will leave you with just one:

Download anything you see on the web as a webpage and add it to your book.

Literally, everything becomes importable.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
formats

What does flash have to do with it?

Image representing Produle as depicted in Crun...
Image via CrunchBase

I was trying to figure out a very specific question today and I have been pretty much stumped ever since.

The question is this: Is there a free webtool that I can use to create interactive drag and drop activities to illustrate a point (The kind of stuff you would have a kid go up on a Smart Board for, where they drag something from one side of the screen into the correct category)?

So far I have come up with these not quite right solutions:

  1. Draggable – a Java Script library that allow for some pretty cool interactive objects on a site, but requires a pretty hefty familiarity with html and web servers.
  2. jClic – a Wonderful Java Webstart program that allows you to author and save a java application for drag and drop (and matching too) activities. This is specifically designed for the elearning crowd.
  3. Dragster – By far the most robust tool that I found, but it costs and it is more sophisticated than I would ever wish on someone who is just wrapping their head around wikis.

So, while I am still looking for an answer (I’m looking at you network), I will be playing with easily the coolest thing I found all day: Produle. Produle is an extremely easy to use interface for creating flash applications (without any programming). I couldn’t believe some of the stuff it would let you do, like add rss feeds, map buttons to data, and even publish your flash anywhere you would like.

While I have never liked the idea of having content trapped within a flash application, I think that it does make sense… it does have some uses. I had a great conversation with an online school colleague earlier this week, during which he said that there was no way that we were going to be able to compete with corporate elearning outfits because of their slick flash objects and project teams. Well, with something like Produle, I think we may have taken at least one feather out of their cap.

We need to be able to create learning objects of all types and share them across any learning management system. No matter how closed flash is, it is a universal format for the web. It can be played by any machine and any LMS. We would have to be pretty foolish not to at least use a freely available tool to create some decent content.

So, I guess my post has two purposes tonight.

  1. I want an answer to my original question.
  2. To ask this question too: What are the things that you have seen in other learning spaces that you would like to be able to do in your own? What is holding you back?
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
formats

The cost of not doing anything…

I was in a great meeting this week where we were considering whether
or not to go ahead with a full scale implimentation of the Moodle LMS
for assessment purposes in our district. It was a great meeting not
because of the topic but the way it was being handled.
 
We were talking about the absolute costs of an open source LMS and of
staying with a custom-built assmessment solution. We were really
looking for a venn diagram moment when one of the curriculum and
instruction representatives said something really smart: “There is a
cost to not doing anything as well. It may not be a dollar cost, but
it will cost the teachers the ability to know more about their kids’
knowledge and it will cost the kids some learning opportunities.”
(Paraphrased by me.)
 
Too often we do not think about the cost of doing nothing or of doing
things too slowly. Does appathy in the face of huge choices cost our
kids the best learning years of their lives?
 
So, it got me thinking: What are the costs of doing nothing (or doing
very little) to change school?
 
Share an idea if this makes you think as much as it has made me.

Posted via email from olco5′s posterous

formats

New Responsibility

I was thinking about waiting until I got a little further into the
project to start blogging about it, but since I made the choice to
start blogging daily, I have really found that this forum let’s me
think through all of the things that I need to.
 
So the new responsibility is this: I have been put in charge of
administrating multiple moodle installations in our district. The
reason why this new charge I have been given is so strange to me is
that up until 2 months ago, the only “official” moodle installation in
our district was at a high school in parker, which I had little to do
with.
 
 The reason for the shift is nothing short of an economic and
pedagogical perfect storm. Our district had slowly been building the
capacity for more and more teachers to start asking for a way of
teaching and engaging with their students online, and with the failure
of our bond election, the only choice for an LMS was to have someone
who was already working in open source to implement and support a
solution like moodle.
 
The best part is, however, that no one I have talked to thinks that we
are settling for something. From all of the initial conversations, all
stakeholders believe that professional development, online learning,
and blended learning fit well within a vision of moodle that includes
outside assessments and google apps for communication.
 
I guess the only reason for this post is to ask for advice. If you
were asked to design and implement learning environments for an online
school, a professional development program, and a blended model
(online and in centers/schools) using moodle, what would you make sure
to do (or not do)?
 
While I have a definite vision for the way forward, I am not the
smartest person in the room (considering that I have no idea how big
this room is). I want to know more… Always more.

Posted via email from olco5′s posterous

formats

Making moving easy…

Every night this week and last I have been packing. I have been
packing up my family to move us to someplace better, with more room
and more possibilities (and more than one bathroom). This move has
gotten me thinking a lot about what to keep and what to let go of.
Without extending a metaphor too far out, it has also gotten me
thinking about how to move an entire school or even a district from
digital learning systems that they currently use, to ones that have
more possibility and room to grow.
 
And, what can we leave behind in this move. When you move from an
email based system of communication to a feed and “friend” based
system of communication (twitter, facebook, or even project wikis),
what is no longer neccessary?
 
 
When you move from a server based architecture for storing learning
objects to a cloud based repository, what is gained and what is lost?
 
The specifics are becoming more and more clear to me as I pack things
up. As I pack up our assessments for the online school, getting them
ready to move again, we can leave behind proprietary formats. We need
to be able to plug them in anywhere and reuse them for many purposes.
 
As I pack up all of our content, I realize that we can leave all html
pages without an edit button on them.
 
And, as I try to put all of our tools and resources for collaborative
and connected learningn into their box to be ported over to a new LMS
or to new PD spaces, I am realizing that there is no box big enough to
hold all of them.
 
Every tool must be allowed to connect to others, just like every
person must be able to connect. If there are tools that do not
connect, they will be packed away permanantly and placed under the
stairs.
 
Well, I am off to pack some more, but I will continue to think about
what can and can’t be thrown out when we make big shifts in education.
I hope to return to this theme soon when I figure more out.

Posted via email from olco5′s posterous

formats

LMS as Legos

LEGO Group
Image via Wikipedia

As I am pursuing my theory of Moodle as the glue that can hold together all of the parts of authentic online learning, I have been looking for other metaphors that support it. Yesterday, I came across this one:

I really like how simple this makes Moodle and LMS work in general. By showing all of the “building blocks” of Moodle, it shows off just how unimportant the all-in-one approach is. If anything can be added, what is the use of trying to design something that can do everything. Rather than working on creating something to do everything, we should be working on creating something that can talk to everything.

We need more legos, not more finished buildings.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
formats

Technological Musical Chairs

Math - Teacher Education - 3D Shapes
Image by Old Shoe Woman via Flickr

Today I had two really good conversations about what is truly important in creating a learning environment for a large organization. We talked about collaborative tools, LMS‘s, project-specific resources, among others. We talked about what were absolute requirements for our institutions (our district and an online charter school through the district). Based upon these conversations, I have realized something pretty big for me.

For a long time, I have been tread the line between the one-size-fits-all model of online learning, in which we try and make a single LMS do everything that we need it to and trying to use and truly going after Small Pieces Loosely Joined. In reality, there is no one solution that creates a learning environment for all stakeholders. However, it is also true that the spirit of joining together small pieces of the web doesn’t mesh with many org charts I know. So, what about this:

What if we have the face of the learning space be a single login page, a portal that determines what type of learner you are. Are you a student, a teacher, or an administrator? Do you learn by collaborating in groups? Do you learn by getting all of your resources delivered right to you in a list to check off?

Once it determines your role, all it would do is present you with a series of links and embedded content. If you are student, you would have links to your classes. If you are a teacher, you would have links to your collaborative lesson planning wiki. It does not have to be beautiful or elegant, it simply has to work. It has to sense who you are as a learner and then present you with a menu of learning options.

This way, you can have as many small pieces as you want and you can change them up as much as you want as an organization, but the face of the organization remains the same. You, as a learner, are serviced by having access to the best specific tools for specific purposes, but the organization is serviced by funelling all of the information through one space.

So, the metaphor goes like this: Every year we are asked to do more and more with less and less. We are asked to run around the room again and again with more chairs taken away. When are forced to shove more people onto the same amount of chairs. And I say, this is a good thing. We need to be whittling down to what is essential. We need to be able to put all of the learning and experience of the people in our institutions into the smallest number of logins and tools… Until we arive at one chair.

One day, we–along with all of our tools–will fit onto a single chair. We will know just how to stack ourselves and our resources so that we fit together perfectly. Until we get there, though, we need to keep on pulling the chairs out. We need to keep on finding ways of simplifying our learning spaces. We need to find ways of joining together the small pieces, to create something great.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
formats

When enough is too much…

LOS ANGELES - APRIL 20:  A man crosses a pedes...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

I want to be able to depend upon all of the spaces that I choose to learn and work in. I want to know that they are there when I need them. Would it be too much to ask that the Learning Management System for our online school work every day and not be the slowest web application that I have ever exeperienced?

When the expectation is that it will be slow… When I have to wait until 10 pm to see if I can actually get some work done… When I need to explain away all of the valid reasons to be frustrated at it… When just having it up and running is enough to be satisfied… Are those the points when it is just too much and you have to make as switch, never looking back upon what was all of your hard work and time.

Now, this is a rediculously specific example, but if I can make a more general point, I would say it is this: What is the point at which you realized that you have been sucker punched by your own decisions? When do you just suck up all of the things you have done and go in a completely different direction because the price of not doing anything is much worse than the pain of tearing yourself away from what has come before?

If something doesn’t change within the next day or so, that time is now.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]